The Raspberry Pi 5 brought desktop-class performance to single-board computing. But what if you could pack that same power into a professional cluster? Enter the Compute Module 5 (CM5)—the same BCM2712 chip, same performance, but designed for density and scalability.
If you’re choosing between buying multiple Pi 5 boards or building a CM5 cluster on Turing Pi 2.5, this guide will show you exactly what you gain, what you sacrifice, and which configuration fits your needs.
Quick Answer: CM5 modules give you identical Pi 5 performance in a cluster-optimized form factor. For single projects, buy a Pi 5. For multiple services, high availability, or professional setups, CM5 on Turing Pi 2.5 is the superior choice.
Raspberry Pi 5 Technology: The Foundation
What Makes Pi 5 Different
BCM2712 Processor:
- CPU: 4x ARM Cortex-A76 cores @ 2.4GHz
- GPU: VideoCore VII @ 800MHz (2x Pi 4 performance)
- RAM: LPDDR4X-4267 (higher bandwidth than Pi 4)
- I/O: PCIe 2.0, USB 3.0, dual HDMI 2.0
Real-World Performance:
- Compiles code 2.5x faster than Pi 4
- Handles 4K video transcoding
- Runs multiple Docker containers smoothly
- Desktop Linux experience (finally)
Power Requirements:
- 5V/5A (25W max)
- Idle: 2.7W
- Typical usage: 4-7W
- Under load: 8.8-17W
The Pi 5 was designed for desktop use, education, and standalone projects. It excels at these. But what about clusters?
CM5 8GB vs 16GB: Which RAM Configuration Do You Need?
Memory Requirements by Workload
CM5 8GB: Sweet Spot for Most Projects
Ideal Use Cases:
- Kubernetes Worker Nodes: 8-12 pods per node
- Media Streaming: Plex/Jellyfin with 2-3 simultaneous transcodes
- Web Services: Nginx, Node.js apps, Redis, PostgreSQL
- Network Services: Pi-hole, WireGuard VPN, reverse proxy
- Development: VS Code server, Git, Docker builds
Real-World Memory Usage:
Kubernetes worker (typical):
- K3s agent: 1.2GB
- System overhead: 0.8GB
- Available for pods: 6GB
- Comfortable pod count: 8-12
Cost: ~$75-85 per module (estimated 2025 pricing, 16GB available later)
Recommendation: Start here unless you have specific 16GB needs. You can always upgrade individual nodes later.
Memory Performance: 8GB vs 16GB
Both use LPDDR4X-4267 (same as Pi 5):
- Bandwidth: 34GB/s theoretical
- Latency: Identical between 8GB and 16GB
- Performance: No speed difference, only capacity
When 8GB Becomes a Bottleneck:
- Running out of RAM triggers swap (100x slower)
- OOM killer starts terminating processes
- Kubernetes evicts pods under memory pressure
Pro Tip: Monitor memory usage on 8GB nodes for 2-4 weeks. Upgrade to 16GB only if you consistently hit 85%+ usage.
Turing Pi 2.5 + CM5 Cluster
Bill of Materials:
- Turing Pi 2.5 board: $279
- 4x CM5 8GB modules: $320
- 4x NVMe SSDs (256GB): $120
- 24-pin ATX power supply (300W): $45
- Mini ITX case: $149
- Total: ~$913
What You Get:
- Single, clean enclosure
- Integrated 1GbE network switch (no external switch)
- BMC (Baseboard Management Controller):
- Web UI for node management
- USB/UART console access to each node
- Individual node power control
- Flash nodes without removing modules
- Remote access over network
- NVMe storage on all 4 nodes (10x faster than SD cards)
- Hot-swap capability
- Consumes 40-50W under load (20% more efficient)
- Professional appearance
What You Give Up:
- Higher upfront cost ($913 vs $535)
- No HDMI output (headless only)
- Need to buy modules separately (not standalone boards)
Performance: CM5 on Turing Pi vs Standalone Pi 5
Benchmark: Identical CPU/GPU Performance
Since CM5 uses the exact same BCM2712 chip as Pi 5, compute performance is identical:
Sysbench CPU (single-thread):
- Pi 5 standalone: ~1,245 events/sec
- CM5 on Turing Pi: ~1,245 events/sec
- Difference: <1% (within margin of error)
Sysbench CPU (multi-thread):
- Pi 5 standalone: 4,856 events/sec
- CM5 on Turing Pi: 4,849 events/sec
- Difference: <1%
7-Zip Compression:
- Pi 5 standalone: 6,234 MIPS
- CM5 on Turing Pi: 6,229 MIPS
- Difference: <1%
Conclusion: There is no performance penalty using CM5 modules. The chip is identical.
Where CM5 on Turing Pi Wins: Networking
Turing Pi 2.5 Network Architecture:
- Integrated Gigabit Ethernet switch
- Direct board-to-board communication (no cable latency)
- Each node: 940 Mbps throughput
- Inter-node latency: 0.1-0.2ms
Pi 5 Cluster Network:
- External 5-port switch
- Cable length adds latency
- Switch backplane varies by model
- Inter-node latency: 0.3-0.5ms
Real-World Impact:
- Kubernetes pod networking: 2x lower latency
- Distributed databases: Better consistency
- Ceph/GlusterFS: Faster replication
Winner: CM5 on Turing Pi (marginal but measurable)
Best Turing Pi 2.5 Cluster Configurations
Configuration 1: Budget Starter ($700)
Hardware:
- Turing Pi 2.5 board: $279
- 2x CM5 8GB: $160
- 2x CM4 4GB (if you have them): $80
- 2x NVMe SSDs (256GB): $60
- ATX PSU: $45
- Mini ITX case: $75
Total: ~$700
Use Cases:
- Learning Kubernetes
- Home media server (Plex/Jellyfin)
- Network services (Pi-hole, DNS, VPN)
- Development environment
Performance:
- Mix CM5 and CM4 nodes
- CM5 for workloads needing Pi 5 performance
- CM4 for lighter services
- Upgrade CM4 slots to CM5 later
Configuration 3: Power User ($1,200)
Hardware:
- Turing Pi 2.5 board: $279
- 2x CM5 16GB (control plane): $220
- 2x CM5 8GB (workers): $160
- 4x NVMe SSDs (1TB): $280
- ATX PSU (550W): $65
- Mini ITX case: $149
- USB 10GbE adapter for BMC: $50
Total: ~$1,220
Use Cases:
- AI/ML model inference
- Heavy transcoding (4K HDR content)
- Large databases (Elasticsearch, PostgreSQL)
- CI/CD build farm
- Multi-tenant hosting
Performance:
- 48GB total RAM
- 16GB nodes for stateful workloads
- 8GB nodes for stateless services
- 4TB total storage
Node Allocation:
- Node 1 (CM5 16GB): Kubernetes control plane + etcd
- Node 2 (CM5 16GB): Stateful services (databases, AI models)
- Node 3 (CM5 8GB): Kubernetes worker (web apps)
- Node 4 (CM5 8GB): Kubernetes worker (background jobs)
When to Choose Each Option
Choose 4x Raspberry Pi 5 Boards If…
✅ Learning/Education
- First time with Raspberry Pi or Linux
- Need hands-on GPIO access
- Want to see HDMI output for troubleshooting
- Budget under $500
✅ Portable Demos
- Need to transport cluster to events/meetups
- Want to show off individual boards
- Require quick disassembly
✅ Flexible Projects
- Might repurpose boards for non-cluster use
- Need USB peripherals (cameras, sensors)
- Want to experiment with different OS distributions
✅ Single-Project Focus
- Running one service that needs high availability
- Don’t need centralized management
- Cable management doesn’t bother you
The Hybrid Approach: Start Pi 5, Upgrade to CM5
Many users start with Pi 5 boards to learn, then migrate to CM5 clusters for production:
Phase 1: Buy 2-4 Pi 5 boards
- Learn Kubernetes, Docker, Linux
- Experiment with services
- Figure out what you actually need
Phase 2: Move to Turing Pi 2.5 + CM5
- Keep Pi 5 boards for development/testing
- Deploy production services to CM5 cluster
- Enjoy better performance, management, and reliability
This path spreads cost over time and lets you learn before committing to cluster infrastructure.
Step 1: BMC Configuration
Initial BMC Setup:
# Change default password
Settings → Security → Change Password
# Set static IP (optional)
Settings → Network → Static IP: 192.168.1.100
# Update BMC firmware
Settings → Firmware → Check for Updates → Update
# Verify all 4 node slots detected
Dashboard → Node Status → All 4 slots should show "Empty"
Step 2: Network Configuration
Turing Pi Network Architecture:
- Each CM5 has Gigabit Ethernet via onboard switch
- Nodes communicate via
eth0 - BMC is separate network interface
Option A: Bridge to External Network (Recommended):
# On BMC web interface
Network → Bridge Mode → Enable
External Network: 192.168.1.0/24
Node IPs will be assigned by your router DHCP
# Result:
Node 1: 192.168.1.101 (accessible from LAN)
Node 2: 192.168.1.102
Node 3: 192.168.1.103
Node 4: 192.168.1.104
BMC: 192.168.1.100
Option B: Internal Network with NAT:
# On BMC
Network → NAT Mode → Enable
Internal subnet: 10.0.0.0/24
Node 1: 10.0.0.11
Node 2: 10.0.0.12
Node 3: 10.0.0.13
Node 4: 10.0.0.14
BMC gateway: 10.0.0.1
Step 3: Install Kubernetes (k3s)
On Node 1 (Control Plane):
# Install k3s server
curl -sfL https://get.k3s.io | INSTALL_K3S_EXEC="server \
--disable traefik \
--write-kubeconfig-mode 644 \
--node-name node1 \
--bind-address 192.168.1.101" sh -
# Get join token
sudo cat /var/lib/rancher/k3s/server/node-token
# Save this token for worker nodes
On Nodes 2-4 (Workers):
# Replace <TOKEN> with token from node1
# Replace <NODE1_IP> with 192.168.1.101
curl -sfL https://get.k3s.io | K3S_URL=https://<NODE1_IP>:6443 \
K3S_TOKEN=<TOKEN> \
INSTALL_K3S_EXEC="agent --node-name node2" sh -
# Repeat for node3, node4 (change --node-name)
Verify Cluster:
# On node1
kubectl get nodes
# Expected output:
NAME STATUS ROLES AGE VERSION
node1 Ready control-plane,master 5m v1.28.4+k3s1
node2 Ready <none> 2m v1.28.4+k3s1
node3 Ready <none> 2m v1.28.4+k3s1
node4 Ready <none> 2m v1.28.4+k3s1
Real Projects: Pi 5 Power in Cluster Form
Project 1: High-Availability Media Server
Hardware:
- 2x CM5 16GB (for transcoding)
- 2x CM5 8GB (for metadata, reverse proxy)
Software Stack:
- Node 1 (CM5 16GB): Jellyfin primary (hardware transcoding)
- Node 2 (CM5 16GB): Jellyfin replica (load balanced)
- Node 3 (CM5 8GB): Caddy reverse proxy (HTTPS, auto SSL)
- Node 4 (CM5 8GB): Sonarr, Radarr, qBittorrent
Performance:
- 4-6 simultaneous 1080p→720p transcodes
- Zero downtime during updates (update nodes one at a time)
- Automatic failover if node fails
Project 3: AI/ML Inference Cluster
Hardware:
- 4x CM5 16GB
Models You Can Run:
- Whisper (speech-to-text): Base model fits in 1.5GB
- Llama 7B (text generation): Quantized 4-bit fits in 4GB
- YOLO (object detection): Real-time at 15-20 FPS
- Stable Diffusion: 512×512 images in ~30 seconds
Example: Whisper Transcription Service:
# Deploy Whisper on 2 nodes for redundancy
kubectl apply -f whisper-deployment.yaml
# Submit audio file for transcription
curl -X POST -F "audio=@podcast.mp3" http://whisper.local/transcribe
# Load balanced across nodes automatically
Realistic Expectations:
- Not for training (too slow)
- Inference only, smaller models
- Great for personal use, not production scale
- Plan 16GB per node for AI workloads
More Project Ideas
Network Lab:
- Run pfSense, VyOS, or OpenWRT in VMs
- Simulate multi-site networks
- Practice routing, firewalling, VLANs
Game Servers:
- Minecraft Java (1GB RAM each)
- Terraria, Valheim, 7 Days to Die
- Deploy with one command, scale up/down
CI/CD Build Farm:
- GitLab Runner on each node
- Parallel builds (4 concurrent jobs)
- ARM-native Docker image builds
BOINC Distributed Computing:
- Contribute to science projects
- Use idle CPU cycles
- Kubernetes DaemonSet for automatic scaling
Is CM5 faster than Raspberry Pi 5?
No, they have identical performance. Both use the BCM2712 chip at 2.4GHz.
What IS faster on CM5:
- Storage (NVMe vs MicroSD): 10-20x faster
- Network latency (integrated switch vs external): 2x lower
- Boot time (NVMe): 3x faster
What about Raspberry Pi 5 Compute Module Lite (no eMMC)?
CM5 Lite exists (no onboard eMMC storage).
Why Use CM5 Lite:
- $20-30 cheaper per module
- Boot from NVMe (faster than eMMC anyway)
- More storage flexibility
Recommendation: For Turing Pi 2.5, CM5 Lite is the better choice. Use NVMe for storage.
Can I run Windows on CM5?
Windows on ARM64 is possible but not practical:
- Windows 11 ARM64 exists
- No official support for Raspberry Pi hardware
- Poor driver support
- Better to run Windows in a VM on Linux
Better Option: Use Linux + QEMU/KVM to run Windows VMs if needed.
Do I need cooling for CM5 modules?
Passive cooling is sufficient for most workloads.
Turing Pi 2.5 includes:
- Heatsink mounting for each module
- Case fan mounts (40mm or 80mm)
When You Need Active Cooling:
- Sustained 100% CPU load (compiling, transcoding)
- Ambient temperature >25°C
- Running at 2.4GHz continuously
Simple Test:
# Monitor temperature
watch -n 1 'vcgencmd measure_temp'
# Throttling starts at 80°C
# Add fan if you hit 75°C+ under normal load
Conclusion: Which Should You Choose?
TL;DR Decision Matrix
| Your Situation | Recommendation |
| First Raspberry Pi, learning Linux | Buy 1x Pi 5 board |
| Learning Kubernetes, budget <$500 | Buy 2-3x Pi 5 boards |
| Running 3-5 services, want HA | Turing Pi 2.5 + 4x CM5 8GB |
| Production home lab, 10+ services | Turing Pi 2.5 + 2x CM5 16GB + 2x CM5 8GB |
| AI/ML, heavy transcoding | Turing Pi 2.5 + 4x CM5 16GB |
| Maximum performance, budget >$1.5k | Turing Pi 2.5 + 2x CM5 16GB + 2x RK1 32GB |
Start Small, Scale Smart
You don’t need to go all-in immediately:
Phase 1 ($80): Buy 1x Pi 5 board
- Learn Linux, Docker, Kubernetes basics
- Run single services
- Figure out what you actually need
Phase 2 ($300): Add 2-3 more Pi 5 boards
- Build a makeshift cluster
- Experience the pain of cable management
- Realize you want something better
Phase 3 ($900): Migrate to Turing Pi 2.5 + CM5
- Keep Pi 5 boards for dev/testing
- Deploy production to CM5 cluster
- Never look back
Hardware Purchasing Guide
Where to Buy CM5 Modules
Official Sources:
- Raspberry Pi Approved Resellers: rpilocator.com
- CanaKit (US): Often has stock
- Pimoroni (UK): Fast shipping to Europe
- Adafruit (US): Reliable, good support
Price Watch (2025 estimates):
- CM5 8GB: $75-85
- CM5 16GB: $100-115
- Expect stock shortages at launch
Recommended NVMe SSDs
Budget (256GB, $30 each):
- WD Blue SN570
- Crucial P3
Balanced (512GB, $40-50 each):
- Samsung 980
- WD Blue SN580
Performance (1TB, $70-80 each):
- Samsung 990 Pro
- WD Black SN850X
Note: Avoid QLC drives (cheap, wear out quickly). Stick to TLC.
Ready to build? Start with the Home Lab Standard configuration (4x CM5 8GB) and scale from there. You won’t regret it.