Building a Raspberry Pi cluster used to mean wrestling with USB power supplies, network switches, and a mess of cables. The Turing Pi 2.5 changes everything – four compute modules on a single mini ITX board with integrated networking, centralized power, and a BMC for remote management.
Whether you’re learning Kubernetes, building high-availability services, or just want a power-efficient home lab, these 15 projects will show you what’s possible when you move from a single Pi to a proper cluster.
Why Build on a Cluster Instead of a Single Pi?
High Availability: When one node fails, others keep running
Load Distribution: Split workloads across multiple nodes
Learning Platform: Practice real-world distributed systems at home
Power Efficiency: 40-50W total vs 150W+ for x86 servers
Scalability: Start small, add more powerful modules later
What You Need to Get Started
Minimum Setup (~$650):
- Turing Pi 2.5 board: $279
- 2x Raspberry Pi CM4 (4GB): ~$140 (estimated)
- 24-pin PSU + power supply: $90
- Mini ITX case: $149
- MicroSD cards or NVMe storage: ~$50
Recommended Setup (~$950):
- Turing Pi 2.5 board: $279
- 2x Turing RK1 (8GB): $398
- 2x Raspberry Pi CM4 (4GB): ~$140
- 24-pin PSU + power supply: $90
- Case + storage: ~$200
Kubernetes Learning Lab (k3s)
Difficulty: Intermediate to Advanced
Best Modules: 4x Raspberry Pi CM4 or 3x RK1 + 1x CM4
Power Draw: 30-50W
Learn production Kubernetes without the cloud bills or power consumption of a full x86 cluster.
Setup:
- Node 1 (control plane): k3s master node
- Nodes 2-4 (workers): Application workloads
What You’ll Learn:
- Pod scheduling and orchestration
- Service discovery and load balancing
- Persistent storage with Longhorn or Rook-Ceph
- GitOps with ArgoCD or Flux
- Ingress controllers (Traefik, nginx)
- Monitoring with Prometheus and Grafana
Real-World Applications:
- Deploy containerized applications
- Practice CI/CD pipelines
- Test high-availability configurations
- Learn multi-node networking
- Experiment with service mesh (Linkerd, Istio)
Why Cluster Matters: Single-node Kubernetes misses the entire point -distributed scheduling, node failure handling, and load balancing only make sense with multiple nodes.
Getting Started:
# On Node 1 (master)
curl -sfL https://get.k3s.io | sh -
# Get token from master
sudo cat /var/lib/rancher/k3s/server/node-token
# On worker nodes
curl -sfL https://get.k3s.io | K3S_URL=https://master-ip:6443 K3S_TOKEN=<token> sh -

Network-Wide Ad Blocking (Pi-hole Cluster)
Difficulty: Beginner
Best Modules: 2-3x Raspberry Pi CM4
Power Draw: 10-15W
Deploy redundant DNS servers so ad blocking never goes down, even during maintenance.
Setup:
- Nodes 1-2: Pi-hole instances with Gravity Sync
- Node 3: Unbound recursive DNS for privacy
- Node 4: Available for other services
Benefits:
- 99.9% uptime for DNS (no single point of failure)
- Load balancing across multiple Pi-hole instances
- Automatic blocklist synchronization
- Recursive DNS = no queries sent to Google/Cloudflare
Configuration:
# Install Pi-hole on nodes 1 and 2
curl -sSL https://install.pi-hole.net | bash
# Set up Gravity Sync for blocklist synchronization
# Configure router to use both Pi-hole IPs as DNS servers
Performance:
- Handles 1000+ devices easily
- <10ms query response time
- Blocks 30-40% of all DNS requests (ads/trackers)
Minecraft/Game Server Cluster
Difficulty: Intermediate
Best Modules: 2-3x Turing RK1
Power Draw: 30-45W
Run multiple game servers or a high-capacity Minecraft server with automatic failover.
Supported Games:
- Minecraft (Java and Bedrock)
- Terraria
- Valheim
- 7 Days to Die
- ARK: Survival Evolved (limited)
Minecraft Cluster Benefits:
- Separate lobby/hub server and game worlds
- Load balance across multiple instances
- Dedicated node for world backups
- BungeeCord for multi-server networking
Setup Example:
- Node 1 (RK1): Lobby server
- Node 2 (RK1): Survival world
- Node 3 (RK1): Creative/minigames world
- Node 4 (CM4): Automated backups and monitoring
Performance:
- 20-30 players per RK1 node (Minecraft Java)
- 40-50 players per RK1 node (Bedrock)
- Automatic world backups every 30 minutes
- Rolling restarts without kicking all players
CI/CD Pipeline (GitLab Runner + Registry)
Difficulty: Advanced
Best Modules: 4x Turing RK1 (for serious builds)
Power Draw: 50-60W
Run your own continuous integration and container registry without paying for GitHub Actions or Docker Hub.
Setup:
- Node 1 (RK1): GitLab CE or Gitea
- Node 2 (RK1): Docker registry
- Nodes 3-4 (RK1): GitLab runners for parallel builds
What It Handles:
- Automated testing on every commit
- Build ARM64 Docker images natively
- Deploy to Kubernetes automatically
- Run code quality checks (linters, security scans)
- Generate documentation
- Multi-architecture builds (ARM + x86 with QEMU)
Build Performance:
- Small Node.js project: 2-3 minutes
- Medium Go application: 4-6 minutes
- Large Rust project: 10-15 minutes
- Docker image build + push: 3-5 minutes
Why Cluster: Parallel runners mean multiple builds run simultaneously instead of queueing. A 4-node cluster can run 8-12 jobs concurrently.
Distributed Computing (BOINC)
Difficulty: Beginner
Best Modules: 4x Raspberry Pi CM4 or 4x Turing RK1
Power Draw: 30-50W (at 100% load)
Contribute to scientific research projects like protein folding, climate modeling, or searching for extraterrestrial intelligence.
Setup: Deploy BOINC clients on all nodes and join projects like:
- Rosetta@home: Protein structure prediction
- World Community Grid: Medical research
- SETI@home: Search for alien signals
- Einstein@home: Gravitational wave detection
- Folding@home: Disease research
Cluster Advantages:
- 4x the computing power of a single Pi
- Distribute different projects across nodes
- Better thermal management (spread across nodes)
- Easy to dedicate specific nodes to specific projects
Performance:
- CM4 cluster: ~500-800 credits/day per node
- RK1 cluster: ~1,200-2,000 credits/day per node
- Total contribution: Equivalent to 2-3 desktop PCs running 24/7
Power Efficiency: Unlike gaming PCs pulling 300-500W, a Turing Pi cluster contributes meaningful compute at 30-50W.
Network Attached Storage (NAS)
Difficulty: Beginner to Intermediate
Best Modules: 4x Raspberry Pi CM4 or 2x RK1 + 2x CM4
Power Draw: 25-40W (plus external drives)
Build a resilient NAS with distributed storage that survives drive failures.
Storage Strategies:
Option 1: Simple NFS/Samba Share
- Node 1: Primary storage server
- Node 2: Backup replication with rsync
- Nodes 3-4: Other services
Option 2: GlusterFS (Distributed Storage)
- Nodes 1-4: Each contributes storage, data replicated across nodes
- Survives 1-2 node failures depending on replication factor
- Scales horizontally as you add nodes
Option 3: MinIO (S3-Compatible)
- Nodes 1-4: Distributed object storage
- S3 API compatibility (works with thousands of apps)
- Erasure coding for redundancy
Use Cases:
- Time Machine backups (Mac)
- Photo/video storage
- Document archive
- Security camera recordings
- VM/container image storage
Performance:
- Read: 100-300 MB/s (limited by Gigabit Ethernet)
- Write: 80-200 MB/s
- IOPS: 1,000-3,000 (NVMe), 100-300 (external USB)
Capacity: Limited only by your drives (10TB+ easy)

Development Environment Cluster
Difficulty: Intermediate
Best Modules: 3x Turing RK1 + 1x CM4
Power Draw: 40-50W
Create isolated development environments that mirror production without the cloud bills.
Setup:
- Node 1 (RK1): Development databases (PostgreSQL, MySQL, Redis)
- Node 2 (RK1): Web application testing environment
- Node 3 (RK1): Build server and code-server (VS Code in browser)
- Node 4 (CM4): Git server (Gitea or GitLab)
Use Cases:
Web Development:
- Test applications in distributed environment
- Simulate load balancing and failover
- Database replication testing
- Microservices development
Mobile/IoT Development:
- Test API backends
- Simulate real-world network conditions
- MQTT broker for IoT device testing
- Local crash reporting server
Learning Platform:
- Practice DevOps tools
- Learn infrastructure-as-code (Terraform, Ansible)
- Test deployment strategies
- Database administration practice
Why Cluster Beats Single Pi: Real production environments are distributed. Testing on a cluster catches issues that single-node testing misses – network partitions, race conditions, split-brain scenarios.
Hardware Recommendations by Use Case
Budget Build ($650 – Learning Focus):
- 4x Raspberry Pi CM4 (4GB)
- Perfect for: Kubernetes, Docker Swarm, Pi-hole, BOINC
Balanced Build ($950 – Best All-Around):
- 2x Turing RK1 (8GB)
- 2x Raspberry Pi CM4 (4GB)
- Perfect for: Media server, NAS, CI/CD, Home Assistant
Performance Build ($1,400 – Maximum Power):
- 4x Turing RK1 (8GB)
- Perfect for: AI/ML, heavy transcoding, large-scale CI/CD
Specialized Build ($1,600 – ML/AI Focus):
- 3x Turing RK1 (16GB)
- 1x NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano
- Perfect for: Computer vision, large model inference
Power Consumption Comparison
Turing Pi Clusters:
- 4x CM4: 20-30W idle, 35-45W load
- 2x RK1 + 2x CM4: 30-40W idle, 50-60W load
- 4x RK1: 35-50W idle, 60-80W load
Equivalent x86 Servers:
- Entry-level tower: 80-150W idle, 200-300W load
- Rackmount server: 100-200W idle, 300-500W load
- Workstation: 100-250W idle, 400-600W load
Annual Power Cost (at $0.16/kWh, 24/7 operation):
- Turing Pi (50W avg): $70/year
- Entry x86 (150W avg): $210/year
- Rackmount (300W avg): $420/year
3-Year Savings: $420-1,050 with Turing Pi vs x86
Community Resources
Documentation:
- Turing Pi Official Docs: docs.turingpi.com
- k3s Documentation: docs.k3s.io
- Docker Swarm Guide: docs.docker.com/engine/swarm
Forums & Communities:
- Reddit: r/homelab, r/selfhosted, r/TuringPi
- YouTube: NetworkChuck, Jeff Geerling, TechnoTim
Configuration Examples:
- GitHub: awesome-raspberry-pi
- GitHub: awesome-selfhosted (258k stars)
- GitHub: homelab (various repos)
Conclusion
These 15 projects represent just the beginning of what’s possible with a Turing Pi cluster. The beauty of the platform is that you can run multiple projects simultaneously – host a media server while learning Kubernetes, run Pi-hole while contributing to BOINC, or create a development environment that mirrors production.
The combination of low power consumption, manageable complexity, and real-world applicability makes the Turing Pi 2.5 the perfect platform for anyone serious about homelab, edge computing, or distributed systems.
Start simple with Docker Swarm or Pi-hole, scale gradually to Kubernetes or CI/CD, and experiment constantly. Every project you build teaches skills that apply directly to production cloud environments – but without the bills.